• OR3X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Meh, until there is an actually good alternative to Firefox with a mature extension ecosystem I’ll continue to use it and just disable the new features I don’t like. I have tried a bunch of the alternatives and they’re all either massively lacking in extensions, are chromium-based, or are sketchy in some way. I think the most promising potential replacement is flalkon, but it’s not there yet and I’m a GTK Stan anyway.

    • pory@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Any gecko-based fork will have everything good about FF (including the addon store) and none of the Mozilla corporation. Waterfox for a seamless de-mozilla’d fork (and nothing else) or Librewolf for extra hardened privacy and fingerprint resistance (plus daily annoyances that come with that).

        • pory@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          After about a year with the browser, I’ll cheerlead it in every thread about Mozilla Corp getting in bed with another ad company or pushing anti-features “that you can toggle off so it’s fine!” into the browser. All the benefits of Firefox as a platform and code base, with no corporation that could profit from you in any way involved. No mandatory ToS, no account, no nothin’. Just a tool for browsing the web, with the full ecosystem of extensions made for Firefox.

          • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I myself will stick to stock Firefox until a credible alternative to Mozilla’s development work on Gecko arises (emphasis on the “work”).