• BanMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Researchers sequenced his DNA recently from a bloodstained couch cushion, we’ve been getting glimpses into it lately.

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Also he’s dead, why do dead people deserve anything, any rights? What harm happens to Hitler? He’s dead. Did we ask dinosaurs to look at their DNA, for all we know they were sentient? The whole argument is stupid.

      • ranzispa@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I may be very stupid about it and not know the normative, but what is the safest option for me is the following. No informed consent -> no research on any samples from the patient.

        Does not matter how important your research is. I myself would like to be informed about that stuff. I may decide to donate my organs to research after I’m dead, but I have decided that.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In the case of DNA, because it’s shared with relatives and descendants who might be still alive. In Hitler’s case, that might not be that much of an issue, but you were talking about dead people in general.

        If your parents are dead, and thus they get DNA sampled, that information gained is good enough to positively identify DNA traces of all their children.

        Remember how they caught the Golden State Killer? They put a DNA sample into the genetics website GEDmatch and found a few of his distant relatives. They then used publicly available family history records to construct a family tree that included all of these matches. That allowed them to narrow down the suspects to two people. One of them could be ruled out by DNA testing a close relative, which left the last one. They then took a DNA sample from his car, which was a match and that’s how they got him.

        Using that kind of stuff to catch killers is likely a good use of the technology, but there’s quite a few nefarious things a state could do with a DNA database of all dead people.

      • PeacefulForest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        When there is a crime scene, the place is searched for fingerprints, hair, fabrics, anything that could find the suspect. No “privacy” is given, because it’s a fucking crime scene. Hitler murdered people, that’s a crime scene. He forfeited any right to privacy when he forfeited his humanity.

        The whole post is ridiculous.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Just a weird topic especially with all this neo-nazism happening in the US government.

      I am not saying it isn’t newsworthy at all of course. It is just the timing is suspect.