I wonder how this will stack up in Texas’s lawsuit. Not that American law matters anymore…
“The causative association . . . between Tylenol given in pregnancy and the perinatal periods is not sufficient to say it definitely causes autism. But it is very suggestive,” Kennedy told reporters, citing animal, blood and observational studies.
Was what he actually said, the headline is click bait.
that not clickbait, it’s called paraphrasing
can’t put the entire paraghaph as a headline
Its deliberately obfuscating a critical part of the quote in order to get more attention.
Its clickbait.
what part?
how would you have worded the headline to avoid what you call clickbait?
You can both be correct
TWO WILL ENTER ONE WILL LEAVE
A respected academic telling me that something or another in data is “suggestive” means something. From a rando pseudoscientist working from the armchair, it means fuck all.
But you said you knew it did…How could you slander/libel this brave american company.
Tylenol told him they’d sue his pants off is likely what happened here. It’s only a US brand of a more generic aspirin after all. So which is it, the generic drug, or the brand name that causes autism? Surely can’t be both in this case.
there is not
sufficientany proof at allFTFY
Here is some evidence that the worm is now moving again.
<sad_trombone.mp3>
deleted by creator
Holy shit! It’s the consequences of his ineptitude all caught up with him! Who woulda thunk!?
KACO?
