This aerial activity, which now occurs on a near-daily basis, is reported by the Taiwan Defense Ministry. The Taiwan ADIZ Violations Database, compiled by independent defense analyst Benjamin Lewis, illustrates a marked escalation in Chinese military operations near Taiwan in recent years.
🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:
Click here to see the summary
The ADIZ, an area where a country asserts authority to identify aircraft for national security purposes, has been a focal point amid heightened tensions between China and Taiwan.
Notably, the figures for last year fell slightly short of the 1,738 ADIZ sorties reported in 2022 due to a quieter December, which saw the lowest incursion rate since July 2022.
December witnessed the detection of 13 distinct aircraft, including various fighter jets, bombers, early warning and anti-submarine planes.
Analysts view the flights by China’s People’s Liberation Army into Taiwan’s ADIZ as a form of gray-zone activity, or pressure that stops short of kinetic warfare.
Bonnie Glaser, managing director of the German Marshall Fund of the United States Indo-Pacific Program, previously told Newsweek that in addition to asserting its sovereignty claims, Beijing aims to use the sorties to wear down Taiwan’s more limited armed forces by forcing them to scramble fighters with each intrusion.
Maritime ADIZ violations picked up after former U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s controversial visit to Taipei in August 2022.
Saved 68% of original text.
It’s a shitty Newsweek headline, is it 1700 planes or 1700 flights? The PLAAF does not even have 1700 planes I think.
In either case, this is worrying. One more reason Ukraine must be successful in its defence, to show that military expansionism is not a viable ideology today.
They have over 3500 aircraft, although a large percentage of them are outdated and almost all of the types used, except for a relatively small number of Russian imports, are untested in combat. Their operational history is universally one of accidents and/or dangerous provocations. Expect even the latest types, which appear modern on paper, to lag at least a generation or more behind any current Western designs in actual capabilities.
It also doesn’t help that there is no institutional knowledge due to a complete lack of combat experience anywhere in the PLAAF, that Chinese military pilots are poorly trained and that China appears to have no ability to deal with American countermeasures and tactics, as evidenced for example by their chaotic and unsuccessful attempt at intercepting Nancy Pelosi’s flight to Taiwan.
It’s weird, I’m seeing very different numbers between Wikipedia pages.
This one says the PLAAF has 565 J-10s for example. This one on the other hand says it has 1000 of them.
They even quote the same book and everything. How do I tell the Wikipedia people about this? I don’t know if I should make an edit either way.
I went through the trouble of tracking the publication down:
https://i.imgur.com/xvTBSm3.png
In more readable form:
J-10A: 220 J-10B: 55 J-10C: 220 J-10S: 70 Total: 565According to the source used by both lists, the numbers in the second list are complete nonsense. It’s not just limited to this plane and its variants though. J-11 numbers are also wrong, even though they also cite this source. I corrected these two and might go over the rest of the list later.
You are awesome.
