Let’s imagine we live in a world the American government is not the American government so you can trust what American companies say when they talk about protecting your privacy and so on…
Some of their products are very cool, some are mediocre. Their browser is not available on linux, which is a shame and it’s android version is essentially webview resulting in security and privacy concerns. I don’t find their search results very good (especially since only Google is allowed to scrape reddit) so I use Mullvad Leta instead. I still use it for image search however. Duck AI is very good, use it all the time.
As they say in Italian “If my Grandmother had wheels she would have been a bike”
Sure… that’s an “interesting” premise but we live in our World, where a lot of American companies are structured the way they are by design. US companies get money from venture capital. That capital is solely designed to dominate. VC money is NOT a loan you get from a bank where you provide a collateral. No VC money is targeting 1 thing : market dominance and 10x returns. Your mom&pop shop will never get VC money because they never say they’ll corner the croissant market, rather they say might sell some baked goods to some people in your limited neighborhood. VC money will NEVER accept such a deal because it might eventually get 2x, at best, and the tiny shop does not even need a lot of capital, just enough for the oven, few people, etc. Peanuts in terms of investment money.
So… American companies are not “evil” because they want to or because a lack of luck. No, rather they become so because of the very structure money is made in the US. The Silicon Valley isn’t special because of Stanford or Berkeley and so many smart grad students. No it’s special because it pulls people from the entire World who dream of dominating markets. It then either select them or transform then select… and in the end you get the same kind of companies with the same kind of strategy with the same kind of money doing the same thing : domination by lowering price, cornering a marketing, raising price, enshittifying. Why? Because it works. It’s a proven business model. Right now it works on ads, and thus privacy… but if another model comes, it’ll use that.
TL;DR: it’s not perfect but it sure beats most if not all of BigTech depending of course on your needs.
I said American because of stuff like the Patriotic Act and crap like that :P
For VPN, I recommend Mullvad instead: https://mullvad.net/en
I’ve tried all the search engines and duckduckgo is the only one that has all the features I need. As for privacy I can’t comment but there’s really no replacement for Duckduckgo, at best there’s Kagi but while I’d be willing to pay a one-time fee for search, a subscription is crossing the line.
All I can definitively say is that it’s better than Google in most use cases. The Hide AI images function is nice, but it’s not perfect. They don’t shove as many junk links at the top, though you’re still gonna get a lot of AI articles but that’s for every search engine nowadays. I use DDG as my daily driver.
By design, DDG doesn’t localize search results as far as I know. The only time I use Google is if I’m looking for a product in a store near me or if I’m really desperate otherwise.
I would choose DDG Browser over Chrome and Edge, and Duck.ai over ChatGPT etc
but would you over Brave or unGoogled Chromium?
Check brave history and you will see the amount of controversies they have. I personally wouldn’t believe anything Brave says.
Personally I use ungoogled chromium when I need a chromium browser, but I can’t recommend it for non-technical users without an auto-updater. I’m not familiar enough with Brave to compare
I’ve read this on GrapheneOS page
“Avoid Gecko-based browsers like Firefox as they’re currently much more vulnerable to exploitation and inherently add a huge amount of attack surface. Gecko doesn’t have a WebView implementation (GeckoView is not a WebView implementation), so it has to be used alongside the Chromium-based WebView rather than instead of Chromium, which means having the remote attack surface of two separate browser engines instead of only one. Firefox / Gecko also bypass or cripple a fair bit of the upstream and GrapheneOS hardening work for apps. Worst of all, Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android. This is despite the fact that Chromium semantic sandbox layer on Android is implemented via the OS isolatedProcess feature, which is a very easy to use boolean property for app service processes to provide strong isolation with only the ability to communicate with the app running them via the standard service API. Even in the desktop version, Firefox’s sandbox is still substantially weaker (especially on Linux) and lacks full support for isolating sites from each other rather than only containing content as a whole. The sandbox has been gradually improving on the desktop but it isn’t happening for their Android browser yet.” https://grapheneos.org/usage
And all I use is Gecko-based hehe (although on desktop), I’m currently using Brave just to have some old/disposable accs logged, but I’m looking for Chromium alternatives… and I just looked at ungoogled git and it seems like I have to download a bunch of stuff to compile it myself, argh, I hate that :P
I just looked at ungoogled git and it seems like I have to download a bunch of stuff to compile it
compiled binaries are at ungoogled-software.github.io/ungoogled-chromium-binaries/
thanks :)
No. If I may be the hypebeast from a earlier thread, hardened Firefox, Waterfox, Librefox, or Tor. I realize Brave is a choice of some privacy advocates, but I’d honestly be rather cautious using Brave. Firefox or derivatives tighten down pretty well. If you wanted a shortcut to hardening Firefox or derivatives, arkenfox’s user.js will jump start you in that direction, tho I always have to tweak some of those settings, but it’s a solid point to deviate from.
