Adam, from California, killed himself in April after what his family’s lawyer called “months of encouragement from ChatGPT”. The teenager’s family is suing Open AI and its chief executive and co-founder, Sam Altman, alleging that the version of ChatGPT at that time, known as 4o, was “rushed to market … despite clear safety issues”.
The teenager discussed a method of suicide with ChatGPT on several occasions, including shortly before taking his own life. According to the filing in the superior court of the state of California for the county of San Francisco, ChatGPT guided him on whether his method of taking his own life would work.
It also offered to help him write a suicide note to his parents.
There is no “intelligent being” on the other end encouraging suicide.
You enter a prompt, you get a response. It’s a structured search engine at best. And in this case, he was prompting it 600+ times a day.
Now… you could build a case against social media platforms, which actually do send targeted content to their users, even if it’s destructive.
But ChatGPT, as he was using it, really has no fault, intention, or motive.
I’m writing this as someone who really, really hates most AI implementations, and really, really don’t want to blame victims in any tragedy.
But we have to be honest with ourselves here. The parents are looking for someone to blame in their son’s death, and if it wasn’t ChatGPT, maybe it would be music or movies or video games… it’s a coping mechanism.
You made my argument for me. There isn’t a thinking being on the other side. Its a computer program that sees the words “suicide” or “kill myself” and has an equally good chance to recommend a therapist or a list of methods. I’m not saying Chat GPT was holding the knife it just unthinkingly showed where to put it to an already suicidal child