• u_tamtam@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yup, though you are comparing 19th century tech to cutting edge tech: the PRC isn’t going to crack EUV lithography on its own any time soon

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago
        • China can’t make modern electronics

        • Okay they can make modern electronics but they’ll never design their own domestic brands

        • Okay they made their domestic brands but they’ll never achieve market dominance

        • Okay their domestic brands dominate their own market but they’ll never see export success

        • Okay they’re seeing export success in the EU, India, SEA, and the Middle East, but they’ll never make their own RAM or set teleco standards

        • Okay they made their own RAM and helped define the standard for 5G, but they’ll never make their own processors.

        • Okay they made their own processors but they’ll never make anything smaller than 10nm

        • Okay they made a 10mn chip but they’ll never make a 7nm chip

        • Okay they made a 7nm chip but they’ll never make a 5nm chip

        • Okay they made a 5nm chip but they’ll never crack DUV

        • Okay they cracked DUV but they’ll never crack EUV <------ YOU ARE COPING HERE

        • Okay they cracked EUV but they’ll never make a 4nm chip

        • Okay they made a 4nm chip but they’ll never build a chip factory around a large scale particle accelerator

        • Okay they built a large scale chip factory around a particle accelerator but…

        • u_tamtam@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          You obviously fall into the trap of believing that hard science cares about politics, and that money thrown at problems as part of national strategic planning magically solves them. But for anyone else legitimately interested in understanding the topic better and having a glimpse at its complexity, those are great resources:

          If the above is too advanced, this can serve as a good primer and answers “how the heck did we get there”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt9NEnWmyMo

          Also, I never wrote that China will never get to EUV (or eventually something beyond that), just that it will take a very long time, because the complexity is spread across several very distinct scientific disciplines, integrating them is a challenge of its own (again, watch the videos), and packaging this into a system that meets the scale and reliability requirements to make it commercially viable hasn’t been reproduced to date.

          • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            EUV is complex, unlike nuclear weapons and energy, 5G, space stations, probes to the dark side of the moon and hypersonic missiles. Those things are simple.

            smuglord

            • u_tamtam@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              EUV is complex. And more so than the accomplishments you mentioned: nuclear weapons were cracked in the 1940’s, probe moon landings in the 50’s and space stations in the 70’s. All have since been reproduced by several nations in isolation. That is not the case of state of the art lithography. No single nation “owns” it because it truly is a multinational endeavor.

              (And actual hypersonic missiles haven’t made it to the battlefield, and 5G is about commoditization and standardization, by the ITU, an organ of the united nations, so I’m not sure exactly how that adds to your rhetoric)

              smuglord

              Way to put your ignorance on display.

              • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                actual hypersonic missiles haven’t made it to the battlefield

                Really? Then how come Russia has had them in service since 2017 and China deployed theirs in 2019? This is just cope from western “military experts” online that can’t deal with the fact that Russia and China have better missiles than America.

                • u_tamtam@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Again, not a military expert, but have you been living under a rock for several years and missed this whole Ukrainian “special military operation”?

                  Russia’s hyped Kinzhal missiles, which promised to defeat air defence systems and be manoeverable at supersonic speeds are being shot down by 80’s era surface to air missiles. And I don’t think anyone has been in a position to assess China’s capabilities in the matter and I have no interest in discussing your beliefs.

                  Edit: forgot to say this really has nothing to do with advanced lithography, anyways…

                  • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Russia’s hyped Kinzhal missiles, which promised to defeat air defence systems and be manoeverable at supersonic speeds are being shot down by 80’s era surface to air missiles.

                    There’s no proof of this ever happening, Ukraine hasn’t been able to provide evidence of shooting down even ONE kinzhal.

                    Also, this has nothing to do with China’s hypersonic missiles.