fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoCursedmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1389arrow-down15
arrow-up1384arrow-down1external-linkCursedmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squarenebulaone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoTo be fair, the large square can not be cleanly divided by the smaller square(s). Seems obvious to most people, but I didn’t get it at first. In other words: The size relation of the squares makes this weird solution the most efficient (yet discovered). Edit: nvm, I am just an idiot.
To be fair, the large square can not be cleanly divided by the smaller square(s). Seems obvious to most people, but I didn’t get it at first.In other words: The size relation of the squares makes this weird solution the most efficient (yet discovered).Edit: nvm, I am just an idiot.