fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoCursedmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1389arrow-down15
arrow-up1384arrow-down1external-linkCursedmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareLoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·2 months agoCan someone explain to me in layman’s terms why this is the most efficient way?
minus-squareDevadander@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 months agoAny other configurations results in a larger enclosed square. This is the most optimal way to pack 17 squares that we’ve found
minus-squareDevadander@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoSeriously? https://lemmy.world/post/32326900
Can someone explain to me in layman’s terms why this is the most efficient way?
Any other configurations results in a larger enclosed square. This is the most optimal way to pack 17 squares that we’ve found
Source?
Bidwell, J. (1997)
Seriously?
https://lemmy.world/post/32326900