1, 4 and 6 are on point. Only missing a gratuitous and vulgar ideological analysis of some form of sexual ingratification.
“There was that article sniff about a man watching porn on the bus, and all the people on the right and on the left saw it and were saying sniff were saying, ‘my God, what happened to society?’ And I saw it sniff, and I said, this man (plucks shirt), this man is a genius! While everyone is out crying about the decay of morals, and the loss of a Lacanian subjective, and so on, this man has found sniff a way to embody in himself the true essence of modernity. Because the distinction sniff between what is private and what is public, that distinction which is at the root of our liberal democratic order – and which, as my master Lacan used to say, is the root of the erotic – that distinction sniff ceases to have meaning when the category of self is mediated through a mass media. This what the Marxists stupidly sniff refer to as a false consciousness…”
🤌
I see this joke’s been refined since the last revision
The Structure of a Slavoj Zizek Essay
-
Remember this Looney Tunes bit?
-
It’s a bit like this obscure event from revolutionary history, isn’t it?
-
It’s all because of this thing out of Freud (Lacan).
-
But not the stupid, obvious interpretation, which stupid left-wing activists believe because they are stupid children.
-
You can also see the same thing at work in this current event that everybody’s talking about.
-
Surprisingly, the most revolutionary position to take vis-a-vis this current event is basically the same as the mainstream liberal position.
-
This is because of dialectics.
-