• Michael Murphy (S76)@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Because that’s not how software development works, and that’s not how you make progress in the field. In order for our technical vision to be integrated with an existing desktop, such as GNOME, it would have required that they give us the reigns to their project to delete their entire codebase and rebuild it into exactly what you see today in COSMIC.

    As in life, sometimes you’ve got to demolish, pave, and build better foundations. There’s a lot of cool technologies available to build a truly next-generation desktop experience in, but you’re not going to get it through rigid bureaucracy and old tools. With COSMIC, we’ve got freedom to make decisions and build something truly unique, and we’re using our talent to show you what we can do.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well said. I’m nervous and excited to see what this turns in to. Pop is my daily driver and has been for years. I’m excited to see all this progress.

    • Unsafe@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you will create “next gen” desktop, you will just solve some problems of already existing ones and create your own. Maturity of software is far more important, than uniqueness. GNOME didn’t evolve into its current state for no reason.

      • Michael Murphy (S76)@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Translation: no one should ever attempt to innovate on the Linux desktop. GNOME is the epitome of software development and everyone else should quietly give up. If GNOME can’t fix an issue, no one can. Only GNOME has the god-given right to make decisions on how desktops are developed for Linux. There can only be one party. The One Desktop principle. Contribute to your party leader, or else…