• umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    to be fair that was a regulator decision. they seem to have went for the low hanging fruit of something relatively easy to replace without impacting the bottom line.

    not gonna save the world by a long shot, but its a better than nothing sort of deal im surprised they even bothered with in the first place.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 days ago

      My conspiracy theory is it was chosen to deliberately harm the optics of environmentalists. Something with minimal useful impact and maximum inconvenience would turn people against the whole idea of environmentally friendly alternatives.

      • syreus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        I see a lot of people who share your opinion. I used to work rehabbing sea turtles and EVERY turtle we received alive or dead had straws/bags in their gut. It might not seem super important but those products look more like jellyfish and turtles have poor eyesight.

        The nets commercial fishing boats make the most plastic waste by a lot but declining a plastic straw and bringing your own bag to shop WILL save a life.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        thats not something i do not shy away from. those fucks are that manipulative.