Their text:

Hello, Happy New Year! I am excited to share some fantastic news to start 2024: we reached our goal of raising $3,300,000 USD in grassroots donations from the Mozilla community before the end of 2023!

Here’s how the Mozilla community came together in the final six weeks of the year:

An incredible 34,667 of us made a donation to reclaim the internet since Giving Tuesday, including 14,972 who made their first-ever gift to Mozilla; More than 3,000 of us donated our voices to Mozilla Common Voice, recording more than 90,000 clips to make voice recognition systems more accessible; And 1,181 of us started a monthly gift to sustain Mozilla’s non-profit work. Because of this support from the Mozilla community, we’ll be able to do even more of what Mozilla does best: holding irresponsible tech companies accountable, advocating for your privacy, and investing in the people, ideas, and organisations who will help reclaim the internet.

Thanks for everything you do for the internet.

Ashley Boyd Senior Vice President, Global Advocacy Mozilla

  • fossphi@lemm.eeEnglish
    0·
    11 months ago

    I don’t understand the negativity. This is objectively good news. Would y’all rather people not donate to the Mozilla foundation? This hostile cynicism against Mozilla popping up time and again is getting old.

    I feel like partly because of this infighting is why stupid stuff like brave and chrome keeps on getting recommended and more and more popular. Like I understand we’re supposed to hold Mozilla to a higher standard and all. But I am really tired of this constant infighting among not just privacy/FOSS enthusiasts but also among the climate movement or left leaning people in general. This need for absolute 100% alignment with one’s goals/beliefs gets no progress done. At some point y’all need to look at the bigger picture and root for the David fighting against the Goliath. FFS does it really need to be spelt out that how big of a loss it’d be for the vision of a free and open internet if orgs like Mozilla aren’t around‽

    • kbal@fedia.io
      0·
      11 months ago

      It’s not difficult to understand why Mozilla has become difficult to root for. This is the news story more people heard about so far this year: https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/02/mozilla_in_2024_ai_privacy/

      “… exploring ways to better integrate advertising while adhering to our focus on privacy and choice”

      I still do root for them of course, since there aren’t really any other web browsers. But they’re not making it easy.

    • juli@programming.devOP
      0·
      11 months ago

      I’d really like to know how you evaluate the following topic. Mozilla’s CEO earns 7 million. Mozilla asks for 3.3 million in donations. Please evaluate pro and con and draw a conclusion.

      • Vincent@kbin.social
        0·
        11 months ago

        Of note is that the Corporation CEO is paid from Corporation revenues, i.e. primarily the Google search deal. Firefox development very likely could not be supported by donations alone, and the Corporation can’t take donations for it.

        Donations to the Foundation go to the Foundation’s advocacy work, and projects like Common Voice.

    • RenardDesMers@lemmy.ml
      0·
      11 months ago

      Again, the CEO is not paid by the mozilla donations. She’s paid fully by Mozilla Corp which does not get donations. Please don’t spread misinformation.

      • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.comEnglish
        0·
        11 months ago

        Answer this: If the corp had 7M to spare, would it go to the same initiatives as the donations? And if not, why?

        • Vincent@kbin.social
          0·
          11 months ago

          They wouldn’t. The Corporation is a separate entity, I believe for tax reasons, allowing them to hold more money. I don’t think that it’s allowed to use it as a loophole to avoid regulations that apply to foundations, while still using that money to fund Foundation projects.

            • Vincent@kbin.social
              0·
              11 months ago

              AFAIK the only way money flows from the Corporation to the Foundation is by the Co paying royalties to the Foundation for the use of the Firefox trademark. Obviously exactly how that number is determined is a little fuzzy, but I don’t think it (legally) can be just any number - it has to be justified somewhat. In any case, the Corporation is not short of money, so if the Foundation wanted more money to flow from it to the Foundation, a shortage of money due to CEO pay is not the reason.

              (You are definitely right in the sense that Co money could be used to fund more Co projects. Those are not the same initiatives that would be funded by donations to the Foundation though, as money doesn’t flow from it to the Co. Think Common Voice, MozFest, lobbying, Privacy Not Included…)