Linux needs to grow. Stop telling people it’s ‘tech-y’ or acting like you’re more advanced for using it, you are scaring away people. Linux Mint can be used by a senile person perfectly.

Explain shortly the benefits, ‘faster, more secure, easier to use, main choices of professionals and free’. Ask questions that let you know if they need to dual boot, ‘do you use Adobe, anti-cheat games, or Microsoft Office’, ‘how new is your computer’, ‘do you use a Mac’.

And most importantly, offer to help them install.

They don’t understand the concept of distros, just suggest Linux Mint LTS Cinnamon unless they’re curious.

That’s it, spread Linux to as many people as possible. The larger the marketshare, the better support we ALL get. We can fight enshittification. Take the time to spread it but don’t force it on anyone.

AND STOP SCARING PEOPLE AWAY. Linux has no advertising money, it’s up to us.

Offer family members or friends your help or copy and paste the below

how to install linux: 1) copy down your windows product key 2) backup your files to a harddrive 3) install the linux mint cinnamon iso from the linux mint website 4) use etcher (download from its website) to put the iso on a usb flash drive 5) go into bios 6) boot from the usb 7) erase the storage and install 8) press update all in the update manager 9) celebrate. it takes 15 minutes.

edit: LET ME RE-STATE, DO NOT FORCE IT ON ANYONE.

and if someone is at the level of ignorance (not in a derogatory fashion) that they dont know what a file even is genuinely dont bother unless theyre your parents cause youll be tech support for their ‘how do i install the internet’ questions.

  • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Stop being elitist.

    Use linux mint.

    Why linux mint?

    It’s like ubuntu but no snaps.

    What’s ubuntu?

    It’s like debian but not as stable. You’ll get more recent apps in ubuntu, test them, and when they are tested companies use the apps in debian.

    Ok, What are snaps?

    You can install packages with snap, but it’s proprietary.

    Ok, that’s bad?

    Yes. Foss apps are great and better than proprietary garbage.

    Ok, foss good, proprietary garbage.

    Why debian and not fedora?

    Because all apps are build for it.

    So it’s like aur?

    No. Aur is made by users for users. Builds on debian are mostly official.

    So the package manager is better on debian?

    Yes, kind of.

    I heard of distrobox. I could use the package manager on any distro.

    Yes, but it’s easier at the beginning to stick to one distro and package manager to get used to it.

    Why not arch?

    It’s too unstable.

    Ok, no arch distro. I heard manjaro is good.

    No, it holds back packages for no reason.

    Ok. What about fedora?

    It doesn’t have as many packages.

    But it has the copr, aren’t there a lot of apps?

    Yes, but it’s like aur, it’s build by users. Debian builds are good, stable and widely used.

    Ok. What about nix? I heared it’s the new arch and there are even more packages.

    Yes, but It’s not for newbies.

    What is an immutable system? I heared that’s the next big thing.

    It’s like android an image based operating system where you can’t brick your system by accident with rm -rf /

    What’s rm -rf /?

    Just test it in a terminal, it’s fun.

    How can I play games?

    You install steam.

    Do I have to configure anything?

    Hopefully not

    Can I only use linux mint?

    No you can use any distro, they are all linux. You can choose whatever you want. Just choose mint.

    Why mint?

    It has no snaps.

    What do I use instead?

    Flatpaks

    If I use flatpaks, why does the package manager matter so much?

    Because not all apps are available as flatpacks, especially command line tools. Snaps has cli but it’s proprietary.

    Can’t I just use any distro and use a debian distrobox for those packages I need from debian?

    Yes, use linux mint, it’s easy to use.

    Do I actually need all those packages? I only use word and steam.

    No, probably not.

    Why not using ubuntu and install flatpaks?

    Because ubuntu sucks.

    But isn’t mint based on ubuntu?

    Yes, but it has no snaps.

    Can’t I just use debian?

    Yes, but it doesn’t have the latest packages.

    How do I install word?

    You can’t. You can use the online version.

    That’s a lot to understand. Can’t I just windows? I only open steam anyway.

    Yes, but it’s proprietary.

    Steam is also proprietary.

    Yes, but you xan play games with it on linux.

    But if steam is proprietary, and windows is proprietary, and I mainly use steam anyway, does it even matter?

    • hendrik@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      No it doesn’t. If you don’t care and just want anything that runs Steam, don’t bother. Just pick anything, it runs fine on most Linux distributions, Windows and probably Mac. You’re fine with tossing a coin. I’d choose Linux in that case since it’s cheaper.

      A proper conversation would be like this:

      What shall I use?

      Depends… What do you want to do with your computer?

      Play games with Steam.

      Alright, then use XY. Wanna know more?

      No.

      Fine.