ekZepp@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 days ago9, 8, 7, 6, 5...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1image9, 8, 7, 6, 5...lemmy.worldekZepp@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-squarebestelbus22@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days agoVideo hosting costs a lot of money. I wouldn’t expect that to be delivered for free
minus-squarebigFab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoYoutube servers are terrible. Why not focus on offering a smoother experience? Then charge what you want.
minus-squarebestelbus22@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoWhat’s terrible about them? I have no issues here in west Europe
minus-squareHStone32@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoThey had a good thing going. YouTube was far from unprofitable. But the skyrocketing density and plummeting quality of ads drove people to adblockers. I suspect though, the day will soon come when ad-space is no longer quite so valuable.
Video hosting costs a lot of money. I wouldn’t expect that to be delivered for free
Youtube servers are terrible. Why not focus on offering a smoother experience? Then charge what you want.
What’s terrible about them? I have no issues here in west Europe
They had a good thing going. YouTube was far from unprofitable. But the skyrocketing density and plummeting quality of ads drove people to adblockers.
I suspect though, the day will soon come when ad-space is no longer quite so valuable.