The BRICS Cross-Border Payment Initiative (BCBPI) will use national currencies, instead of the US dollar. Russia’s finance ministry and central bank released a report detailing plans to transform the international monetary and financial system.

As the chair of BRICS for 2024, Russia proposed the creation of a BRICS Cross-Border Payment Initiative (BCBPI), in which members of the organization will use their national currencies to trade.

BRICS will likewise establish an alternative messaging infrastructure to circumvent the SWIFT system of interbank communication, which is overseen by the United States and subject to Western unilateral sanctions.

There are also plans for the establishment of a BRICS Grain Exchange and associated pricing agency, with centers for trade in commodities like grain, oil, natural gas, and gold, which can likewise be used to settle trade imbalances.

These proposals were outlined in the report “Improvement of the International Monetary and Financial System”, which was co-authored by the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, the Bank of Russia, and the consulting firm Yakov and Partners.

In February 2024, the finance ministers and central bank governors of BRICS met in Sao Paulo, Brazil. There, the Russian representatives said they would prepare a report “for BRICS countries’ leaders with a list of initiatives and recommendations on ways to improve the international monetary and financial system”.

Russia’s Finance Minister Anton Siluanov explained the motivation:

“The current system is based on existing Western financial infrastructure and the use of reserve currencies. It is severely flawed and is increasingly used as a tool of political and economic pressure. Another reason for a reform of the international monetary and financial system is the geo-economic fragmentation that became a result of the abuse of trade and financial restrictions.”

The Russian BRICS chairmanship report argued that the international monetary and financial system (IMFS) is not only unjust but also inefficient, as it is a monopoly that suffers “from excessive reliance on a single currency and centralized financial infrastructure”.

The document noted that the “current IMFS is primarily serving interests of AEs” (advanced economies) – that is, largely the wealthy countries of the West.

As of 2023, the original five BRICS countries make up 32% of global GDP (measured at purchasing power parity, PPP), but have only 13.54% of voting shares in the IMF.

On the other hand, the G7 nations hold 41.27% of the voting shares in the IMF, despite the fact that they comprise just 30% of global GDP (PPP).

Archive link

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The protocol isn’t even the issue, banks already use XRP.

    It’s the fact that USD is propped up by Uncle Sam’s globalized monopoly which is kept in tip top shape by geopolitical power.

    Everyone trades in USD because it’s the de facto currency and it’s stable because the government can abuse its power to keep it that way.

    No one trusts the value of the Ruble, Yuan, Rupee, or even any other currency except for maybe the Euro. They all exist for internal use, which means its just gets compared in value to USD whenever you have to deal with anything external, which is all the time.

    BRICS would only fly if a stable trade medium can rapidly prove its worth with market stress and trade requirement, otherwise everyone will just continue to use USD, hence why the USA doesn’t currently view it as much of a threat. And even if you could get countries on board, the US can hold on to a massive noose around everyone’s neck by refusing to trade in anything but USD, which would effectively shut you off from trading with a massive portion of US based/owned/partner companies.

  • jecxjo@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    It looks to be pushed by a few big countries who love to tamper with their monetary system which will be a big No No if they are part of the new system. This feels like a foot gun.

    • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Can you elaborate? What tampering do you mean, what benefits does it provide, and why would the be lost because of this move?

      • jecxjo@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        China has intentionally printed and destroyed currency to maneuver themselves against other countries. It’s one thing where you modify rates to influence inflation and spending but extreme manhandling your financial system means you are not a stable system to base the world economy on. While any country could screw everyone over, its the fact they have already manipulated things that makes them scary.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      lmfao hard to think of a better example of a country tampering with its monetary system than the US printing trillions of dollars every few years 🤡

      • jecxjo@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        there is a difference from trying to stabilize an economy by controlling inflation and rates. We’ve seen China modifiy their currency maliciously. If China or Russia dont see favorable trade in their direction both would easily tank their economy to destroy other countries.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          Oh do explain in what way China modifies their currency that’s malicious. Also, hilarious amounts of projection happening there. Only fucked in the head westerners see everything as a zero sum game where they’d rather destroy the world than live with the fact that somebody out there is doing better than them.

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Cool. I can’t wait to accept 100 rubles just for it to be worth 50 rubles few days later. 🙄