• some_guy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    you’re unlikely to see any increase in quality between streaming and… DVD/Blu-ray

    tell me you dont care about video quality at all without telling me you dont care about video quality at all.

    it is incredibly easy in a blind a/b test to pick put a streamed title vs a native bluray title. by video and by audio (provided you are using something that isnt your shitty built-in TV speakers). im not sure why youre confidently making this assertion that literally anyone can test at home with basic equipment.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ll admit to arrogance on blu-ray, I have never owned a blu-ray player. My assertion was in regards to DVD, which I do still own a player for and use reasonably regularly. I don’t seriously think anyone is buying DVDs for the purpose of quality, since afaik they are still only 1080p max. At the very least, most of the DVDs that I personally own are still SD, and as such look about as good as 4k streamed with compression.

      • some_guy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Titles that have never been released on bluray (but did have a DVD release) are still noticably better on disc than streamed. And that is a surprising number of older TV shows.

        It’s not even a subjective preference thing. Any layman could identify the physical media as higher-quality in a blind test.

        If you’re like watching on a phone or small tablet I can understand why you would think they’re equivalent, but in any kind of home-theater environment (even a cheap-ass one) physical media will be obviously higher-quality in every scenario.