• Skaryon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love how in every topic about WFH there’s some dudebro going on about the economy suffering due to supposed lessened productivity and I’m like… Why should I care?

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love the abstract “productivity”.

      Like yo, cancer is incredibly productive.

      Demolishing subsistence farms and replacing them with cash crop slave plantations is mad profitable.

      I could make thousands of dollars in a day if I just sold everything I own.

      Our metrics of economic growth revolve around basically doing all of the above, to varying degrees of figurative vs. literal-ness.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not how productivity works. It’s basically looking at how much a person can produce with a given amount of labor.

        Take that small scale subsistence farmer. Individually, they will live a precarious life. Their country will not have the surplus food needed for other pursuits like building cities, engaging in R&D, developing science, and so on. A smaller and smaller number of people need to be able to feed more and more using less land per person.

        Manually copied manuscripts are another example. They were painstakingly copied over by hand in an incredibly low productivity manner. The introduction of the printing press essentially eliminated an art form, but gave rise to practical mass media.

        In the present day, computers have been the main form of productivity booster. While arguably social media is a drag on productivity, overall computers open up a broad range of possibilities.

        Like yo, cancer is incredibly productive.

        Cancer is incredibly costly to society. Think about it, a single person getting cancer could mean many hours of them being in the hospital. Net zero on productivity

        Demolishing subsistence farms and replacing them with cash crop slave plantations is mad profitable.

        As I detailed above, transitioning from unproductive farms to highly productive farms is necessary. Don’t believe me, ask Mao.

        I could make thousands of dollars in a day if I just sold everything I own.

        That would not be a productive activity since there would be no value added. Arguably there would be less value, since that stuff is likely worth more to you than it is to another person.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an american, who gives a shit about all that stuff when your family savings can be wiped out, home foreclosed upon, and bankrupted just because you get sick or suffer an injury!? Even if you plan and do everything right, it could still happen to you, through no fault of your own.

    So, IMO until we have universal healthcare like every other modern nation, they all beat us…

    • matter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What about three weeks of extra annual leave, public holidays, real healthcare with no bullshit co-pays (and unlimited sick days, they don’t count towards “pto”), a maximum 35 hour work week… Because that’s more like what it would look like for a higher value job like that. Depends on the country and the job, of course. But in my case in the UK right now, and in my last job in Germany, my total “pto” in US terms has been roughly two months. (Which is a lot even here, but it’s not by any means unheard of, and easy to get if it’s a priority to you). Doing a job with an average salary of about 100k in the US, and I get paid a little over 50k £ for it, which is about 1.5 times the median salary here, so even after the recent inflation it affords a pretty comfortable lifestyle, it’s enough money to pay the mortgage and take holidays to the continent in my ample time off.

      Sorry, this turned into a bit of a rant, but tldr: it’s not just “an extra week”

      • rosenjcb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Still not worth it. I broke my leg 3 years ago I paid $2.4k total with my insurance. Today it’d be more like $5k as my insurance isn’t as good, but it would still be worth it to stay in the US even if I broke a bone every 3 months! However, two months of PTO is certainly something. But to be honest, my mentality is in a place where I’d probably end up doing some work on the side if I honestly had 8 weeks of PTO. Even when I had unlimited PTO, I only took like 4-6 weeks a year.

        I think broadly speaking, if you make under $120k/year in the US, your quality of life will be better in Western Europe just because of the social safety net and worker’s protections. And this is especially true if you’re planning on having children.

        • then_three_more@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          {edit, I have no idea why the Lemmy algorithm decided to put this on my front page today}

          I think that big difference is for low paid workers, rather than higher flyers.

          Comparing a store assistant position between Lidl USA and Lidl UK.

          Lidl USA

          • Starting pay $16.00 per hour
          • Up to 20 days of Paid Time Off (PTO) to use for sickness or vacation, plus 6 paid holidays annually

          Lidl UK

          • Starting pay £12 (current exchange rate $15.21)
          • 30 days holiday (increasing to 35 after 5 years service)
          • 10 days sick.