the church of uncle bob would like to speak to you about the sins of commenting.
Self-explainable, when you aren’t writing spaghetti Perl scripts.
We have to go deeper.
* Gets the user **/ fun getUser() { return this.user; }```It should have the numbers change in the middle like a digital clock but look like the numbers on a clock.
someone else’s code would have the wrong values.
I know I’m probably doing it wrong but this is how I feel whenever I write unit tests
basically how it feel when a professor requires u comment every single line of code u write to explain it. I know people tend to drop out of real engineering to do programing but an entire 4 years of this bullshit as opposed to just a couple classes sounds way worse than calc 3 or differential equations.
The only problem with courses like calc 3 and differential equations (in my experience, as a mathematician) is that they are cheating somewhat. By cheating I mean relying on inadequate, flawed or entirely omitted proofs. How can the students truly understand something if they are not presented the whole story (or at least reference)?
The good thing about these courses are that there are usually no shortage of relevant exercises!
u could be right calc 3 was alright, pretty fun actually but differential equations i still dont get at all, maybe i should try learn it on my own now with more time and no pressure.
When you ask a Dev to test their own code
