I am shocked. Shocked! /s

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t get why, I can’t see this be difficult or costly to run, but then again I have no clue, never ran a Mastodon instance.

    I would assume that it’s not worth the small reach compared to running X / Bluesky / Threads accounts but then again, like I said, the cost must be super small. 🤷

  • Mina@berlin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    @dantheclamman

    I am definitely starting to hate #Mozilla.

    As a remark: I have always been fine with their deal with Pocket and having Google as their default search engine. In the end, there are bills to be paid.

    Until I learned that e.g. Mozilla Corporation’s CEO is on a multi-million dollar salary, and they’re hiring ai and ad people.

    Not OK for an entity where many highly skilled people code for free.

    It’s not what users want the cash to be spent on.

    Leaving the Fedi is the final drop

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was cool with them buying Pocket. But as a long time user of Pocket, I feel it has horribly stagnated. Far more features have been lost than have been gained.

      • Kushan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Stagnation is Mozilla’s MO. Fuck, go look at Thunderbird and be transported back to the 90’s.

        Even Microsoft is updating outlook - fucking outlook is innovating, Outlook being the cancer on email that’s held it back for decades, is being updated.

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think you might be overestimating how much code is contributed by unpaid volunteers…

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I adore Firefox. Just tired of Mozilla trying features (FF Panorama) and hobbies (Notes) and then abandoning them

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      We aren’t fickle. We adhere very strongly to our principles but it’s easier to direct people to a name when they aren’t interested in understanding why.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      with how many singular developers managed to do it based on Firefox when Mozilla couldn’t pull their shit together, idk why anyone would still be holding their breath. just switch to a competent fork.

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              but there is a base, and it isn’t good. the forks are. you said you want a good browser. they’re not making it. the forks are good. idk what you’re arguing about.

              • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Most forks take an ESR version and build on top of that. Who is gonna make that ESR base?

                You’re saying the equivalent of ‘I don’t care about the Linux kernel cause Ubuntu is better and everyone should use that’ of arguments.

                Not saying you are literally saying ^

                • pyre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  have I said anywhere that Firefox should cease to exist or Mozilla shouldn’t do security patches or whatever because i thought we were talking about having a good browser experience.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can we all just use a “bad browser” that isn’t “as good” as these exploitative mainstream browsers by specifically giving up on websites that require a browser that exploits us? We shouldn’t need to be exploited.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would be mad if this would be next to fall since I use it. I don’t self-host Matrix since it is too expensive built on a fundamental ‘eventual consistency’ model mirroring all text & attatchments for all usersmin every DM & room—not to mention the Python implementation server & even the Rust one use much more system resources than other open chat options. It’s the same for Mastodon specifically too which but Ruby this time—with eventual consistency chewing up GiBs of storage making small players shut down instances. I would not be surprised that it fell next just based on cost.

      Wanting to get folks off proprietary garbage like Slack, Telegram, & Discord was the right idea but moving to Matrix will prove to be a mistake as nodes are too expensive to run therefore leads to the centralization we need to escape. With the poor performance of the flagship Element client too, casual users think it is too damn slow (literally takes 2 minutes to even get to a screen with text in my browser & it isn’t even done syncing).