• str82L @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    In fairness I do believe Johnny somehow managed to do it better, but credit where credit is due.

    • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Said this before on this platform, opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. It’s your opinion that you think Johnny’s version is better.

      I like both versions of the song. They have a different delivery.

      • str82L @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I too like both versions, and actually writing such a powerful song is something Trent deserves huge credit for. Talent all round.

      • ziggurat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t know how to speak music, but I’ll try. I think the dissonant notes together with i believe micro tonal pitch bending (maybe I don’t know i have bad pitch) in the original better illustrate the discomfort of Trent very poetically.

        Also Cash sensoring the original lyrics is okay, but it doesn’t deliver has hard.

        Don’t get me wrong, both versions are beautiful, and this is just nit picking

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      There’s a lot of those. Patti Smith’s “Because the Night” is better than Bruce Springsteen’s performance of the same. Leonard Cohen has a voice that’s something of an acquired taste, so most people prefer Jeff Buckley’s version of “Hallelujah”.

      Patti Smith also had an excellent version of “Teen Spirit”, but it’s more of a different take than better, I’d say.