• LotrOrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    First off, weird to point out that they’re “age appropriate”

    If your kid reads above the age level and understands it that’s generally a good thing

    Number two I don’t get why this is such a weird concept on how to explain things to a child. Seems pretty normal and “age appropriate”

    • ripripripriprip@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not only that, it’d be better to ask the kid why oxygen tanks are needed on spacecraft, then ask why we don’t need them here on earth.

      It’s a weird post, in general.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yep. I was reading at a 6th grade level in 1st grade, and had advanced to university level comprehension by 5th grade. WTF was an “age appropriate book?”

      I’m pretty sure that those people would have been incensed, if they knew that I chose TLotR as my 1st grade book report. (This was in 1985, so while there was an animated movie, it didn’t cover the entire three books, so I had to read them.)

      • waz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I assumed age appropriate was regarding content not difficulty. It is still a weird thing to emphasize though.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          They undoubtedly wouldn’t approve of the content of some of the books I was reading back then either. I had already learned the extremely broad strokes around sex and reproduction by the first grade. My parents have a farm with livestock. I was also reading computer manuals learning how to be a greyhat, before the term even existed.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It always strikes me regarding the mental gymnastics people engage in regarding consumption of entertainment. Violent video games*, even if it’s cartoon violence, tv and movies are everywhere. But people clutch their pearls if it’s in a book format. The world is ending if it’s sexual. Hell, Utah just banned Judy Blume books.

          *I’m not condemning video games, study after study has proven that violence in games doesn’t lead to violent behavior, just that we find violence in games acceptable vs people losing their shit over a girl getting her period in a book for YA’s.

          • waz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Technically only one Judy Bloom book, but your point still stands and I agree. It’s pretty bizarre.