• Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    If you can’t remember the IP address of every site you’d like to visit, you don’t deserve the internet.

  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s insecure, which lets governments like China poison it. They straight up block encrypted DNS

  • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Tbh, if you can’t tap out Ethernet frames with a Morse key and decode the response by watching the blinking of an LED wired to the RX pair then you really don’t deserve to be on the internet. Git Gud.

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Lol … DNS is one of the pillars upon which the internets tands, a crumbling mess of a pillar but I’m sure glad we don’t have a name system built on hosts files 😹

  • Mactan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I have no doubt in my mind that there’s some subset of the suckless crowd that thinks dns is bloat

  • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    My prediction is that we’ll go DNSSEC globally when IPv6 gets mainstream adoption. It sucks how many just don’t care enough.

    • Chobbes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      The abysmal adoption of DNSSEC is just embarrassing, and I haven’t heard any good arguments for why we shouldn’t do it. There’s one blog post that gets passed around as justification for not adopting DNSSEC, but it doesn’t really go into any technical detail and is mostly just the author saying “I’m scared of governments and TLDs”… which is maybe fair, but you still have to trust them for regular CA certs and everything, so why not make thr base secure?

      Honestly, I might care slightly more about DNSSEC than IPv6 adoption… IPv4 exhaustion and NATing everywhere sucks, but the fact that you can’t trust DNS is like… insane.

    • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      when IPv6 gets mainstream adoption

      At the current speed that would approximately be in 2087.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

      This might be funnier than all those Facebook accounts with warnings about “I do not authorize anyone to use my photos!”

      Because they’re trying to copyright an internet comment that they posted on a service hosted by someone else, with a creative commons license attached. It’s like a step up in knowing how shit works, but still not knowing enough.

      If you really want ownership over what you say… don’t post it on the fucking internet.

      • averyminya@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Wait lol are people posting that to their comments to use it as claimed ownership? I did not realize that was the intent there

      • leopold@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean, not really. You own the stuff you create regardless of who’s hosting it. Microsoft doesn’t own the copyright for the millions of projects hosted on GitHub either.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          And yet Microsoft made Copilot, and there are currently lots of clueless programmers out there using it to inject code with god knows what licenses into their company’s software.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          You own the original, which you’ve written on your pc or phone. But the one that ends up on the website is a copy, on which you’ve granted the website owner a non-revokable license to do with as they please ie. a copy-right.

          • leopold@lemmy.kde.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Not really. You’ve granted the owner some rights, such as the right to host your content and present it to any user on the platform, but they don’t own it. Twitter can’t start using any art hosted on their platform for their branding, because it’s no theirs.

            • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              They can if the license you granted them says they can. Read it. These platforms usually make you grant then extensive rights. Yes they don’t own the content but given such broad permissions it makes very little practical difference.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I use pigeons and let the wind tell me where to send them.

          So is other guy gonna sue me now and win because I just copy and pasted what they said? This is a joke.

          • leopold@lemmy.kde.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            I mean, probably not. That’s such a short post, chances are courts wouldn’t find it copyrightable. And obviously attaching a license at the end of your comments is useless in practice, because no one on the internet actually properly engages with copyright law. Plus suing over copy-pasting someone’s social media post is dumb as hell and no one does that, tho I do think you could technically do it and win, because current copyright laws make zero sense if you actually stop and think about it for any amount of time.

              • kbal@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                My lawyers will argue that this willful infringement of my rights as the orignal author of the famous 1997 Internet comment “So true” means that you now owe me $4000000 in damages, but I’ll settle for one bitcoin.