• pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      you can’t quantify it. there are entire languages spoken by one small town. it’s a matter of what you deem notable. as op said, dictionaries are reports. not that different from journalists and what they choose to report, sometimes it’s worldwide phenomena, sometimes it’s something barely consequential that happens in one small town. it’s about what they deem noteworthy.

      for a dictionary, it’s about what’s useful for people as a reference. if you think something that’s used by 9 people in a town might be useful if people hear it and want to look up in the dictionary then you put it in. there’s no law that governs it.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        So.

        Hypothetically.

        If start using “squiggy” to mean “the excited tremors or shaking puppies, kittens and small kids do when they are very excited”….

        Is that enough? Or do I need to get my nephew in on it?

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          for you, it’s enough; for a dictionary, that’s their decision. dictionary is not a law book. it’s not a religious book either. it is not ordained by god. it’s just a report of what words the speakers of a language use. which words are included or not are arbitrary and editorial decisions. what do you think makes the “cut” in a small pocket dictionary with 2000 words vs a bigger dictionary with 10,000 words? do you think once you publish the pocket dictionary, 8000 words stop being legit?

    • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some N greater than zero, though probably at least two unless you’re inventing a language/dialect on your own.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re conflating two topics.

          1. How many people using a word in an existing language makes that word a word from a descriptivist context?
          2. How many people does it take to make a conlang?

          The answer to the second is, of course, one, but that’s a very different question than the first one. The first question doesn’t have a definitive answer. The more people that use some new word the stronger the claim is that it is in fact a word is, but there’s never a moment when you can definitively say everyone agrees that it is a new word. (If you could then we wouldn’t need to ask the question at all lol.)