New GNOME dialog on the right:

Apple’s dialog:

They say GNOME isn’t a copy of macOS but with time it has been getting really close. I don’t think this is a bad thing however they should just admit it and then put some real effort into cloning macOS instead of the crap they’re making right now.

Here’s the thing: Apple’s design you’ll find that they carefully included an extra margin between the “Don’t Save” and “Cancel” buttons. This avoid accidental clicks on the wrong button so that people don’t lose their work when they just want to click “Cancel”.

So much for the GNOME, vision and their expert usability team :P

  • dayna@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Looks nice to me. Basing design decisions on contrarianism is silly. If you don’t like it that’s alright. Disliking it because it looks like something else that also looks good is silly.

  • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Both designs are good imo. Adding the extra space for the “cancel” button could cause a copyright claim so I think that’s a viable reason why it’s absent in GNOME. And I don’t see anything wrong in copying Apple design. They can do what they want and the new design is very nice in terms of ease of understanding and accessibility potentials. GNOME’s workflow is similar to Apple’s so why not copy some more things for better consistency?

    • TCB13@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Both designs are good imo. Adding the extra space for the “cancel” button could cause a copyright claim

      What ahaha since when a modal is copyrighted? I don’t buy it, this is simply poor design by the GNOME team.

      GNOME’s workflow is similar to Apple’s so why not copy some more things for better consistency?

      Exactly my point, but they should learn how to properly copy things. Or at least think about them, Apple didn’t add the margin for no reason.

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I get it that you hate this design and its obvious strong inspiration by Apple but accusing GNOME team in being lazy is too much. They created the most popular and one of the most stable DEs on Linux and their own workflow that’s similar to Apple’s but still is unique. Also when I saw that new design, I was amazed. To me it looks really great. It’s going to be a good update with accent color support (I won’t fight about it ok?) for sure. It’s just a matter of preference. Both designs are good enough technically imo.

        • TCB13@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I get it that you hate this design

          I don’t hate it, it looks better than what was there before, no doubts there, but at the same time they could’ve just made it better.

          All the literature on action buttons with dangerous effects tells you to add margins, accents and shades. Any design undergraduate should be aware of this, however the GNOME team totally missed it.

          It’s going to be a good update with accent color support (I won’t fight about it ok?)

          It’s funny that you mention that because…

          In macOS, you can specify an accent color to customize the appearance of your app’s buttons, selection highlighting, and sidebar glyphs. The system applies your accent color when the current value in General > Accent color preferences is multicolor. https://support.apple.com/en-mt/guide/mac-help/mh15217/mac

          I’m totally okay with “being inspired” (cloning) macOS, it should be viewed as good thing because Apple does spend a lot in UX research however lets make thing properly.

          • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t hate it, it looks better than what was there before, no doubts there, but at the same time they could’ve just made it better.

            How? Improving something like this is hard. Do you have any proposals?

            All the literature on action buttons with dangerous effects tells you to add margins, accents and shades. Any design undergraduate should be aware of this, however the GNOME team totally missed it.

            I’m afraid to tell you that in 2024 nobody cares about that. “Shape following feeling” in MD is the best example I can think of. Now aesthetics is preferred to make people buy (or use for free in this case) the product. People are not tech savvy. They want good looks and GNOME nailed it imo. It’s stunning. They even got me but I do care about aesthetics unfortunately. I’m a spoilt mass consumer. Eject me if you will.

            accent color

            Accent color taboo. Let’s not talk about accent color.

            • TCB13@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              How? Improving something like this is hard. Do you have any proposals?

              I’ve submitted a fair share of UX in-depth analysis with examples and links to literature on the GNOME team blog and they tend to ignore / comment dismissingly and then remove my comments after a few weeks.

              Accent color taboo. Let’s not talk about accent color.

              Ahahaha

              • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Judging from your post and replies, you look very aggressive, rude and demanding so no wonder the devs deleted your comments.

                • bitfucker@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  To be fair, he could also just be fed up after a long time being ignored for what he thinks is quite an important design decision.

        • Shareni@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          the most popular

          Citation very much needed

          one of the most stable DEs on Linux

          Hardly, but I’m guessing you’re thinking of reliability instead. Not really surprising when it’s so stripped down that vanilla GNOME is pretty much unusable. When you extend it, in order to get a proper DE, that goes right out the window.

          That fact makes it especially funny that vanilla GNOME is by far the fattest DE around. How it manages to use up more resources than KDE is beyond me.

          • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Citation very much needed

            Ubuntu, RHEL and Fedora use it as the default and they are very big distros. Idk if it’s enough but that’s what I know.

            Hardly, but I’m guessing you’re thinking of reliability instead.

            Idk. KDE was unstable for me and it always has bugs after major releases. They should test things better.

            Not really surprising when it’s so stripped down that vanilla GNOME is pretty much unusable.

            Personal opinion.

            That fact makes it especially funny that vanilla GNOME is by far the fattest DE around.

            Deepin.

            How it manages to use up more resources than KDE is beyond me.

            You have a point here. Qt is better in terms of efficiency afaik and performance is extremely important for an OS component. But hey at least it’s getting better over time.

            • Shareni@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Ubuntu, RHEL and Fedora use it as the default and they are very big distros. Idk if it’s enough but that’s what I know.

              I mean, that’s pretty irrelevant. If you were for example at least comparing the downloads of fedora Vs spins, that would be a beginning of something.

              Idk. KDE was unstable for me and it always has bugs after major releases. They should test things better.

              1. In case it wasn’t obvious: stability is not reliability

              2. So does GNOME, especially when you have a lot of extensions

              3. KDE is pretty crap in both regards

              Personal opinion.

              Is that why every distro comes with vanilla GNOME? Oh wait…

              But hey at least it’s getting better over time.

              Meanwhile over the years KDE got lighter than GNOME while constantly piling on features.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    My only problem with both designs in your images is the colors. It’s a pretty standard part of UI design (in real life and on computers) that “red means cancel” and “green means continue.” Apple using blue is no big deal and I’m 90% sure they just use a user chosen “highlight color.” (Maybe Gnome as well?) But cancel or delete or similar things should probably be red or another color that signals “Stop.”

    I’ve always thought Bootstrap, the web design library, has a good set of base colors. Red means danger. Light blue means info. Green means yes or success. Yellow means warning. Other buttons are a darker blue — basically the highlight color. (Not saying they chose the best version of those colors. Just that the general idea is consistency and what users most naturally expect.)

    • TCB13@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve always thought Bootstrap, the web design library, has a good set of base colors

      Yes it does. Those guys did a really good job.

  • Chef6652@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I hope they continue learning lessons from other OSes.

    I’m feeling like you are wrong about them outright copying. Some good things can be taken from macOS and Windows. But a lot of bad things too, which is why they are thinking it through.

    Please do not reduce the community effort to “cloning macOS”. It’s insulting to the people working on it… Apple doesn’t own modals or modal design.

    Here there are not 20 ways of putting 3 buttons in a modal. They just happen to choose a way that will also work on mobile I guess.

    Kudos for noticing this extra space which could enhance these kind of modals though.

    I don’t like everything Gnome has been doing, especially with the lack of customization or the status bar. But Gnome has been my go to for 7+ years and I like where it is going. Extensions are pretty fly too 👌

    • TCB13@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Please do not reduce the community effort to “cloning macOS”. It’s insulting to the people working on it…

      Well, it’s insulting for people to lose their work because someone did a lousy UX job. :)

      Cloning macOS should not be views as something “bad” because for what’s worth we all know Apple spends a LOT in usability research (they’re not as good as they used to be, but still better than the rest).

      Kudos for noticing this extra space which could enhance these kind of modals though.

      That’s the thing, I’ve basic design / UX training and all the literature on action buttons with dangerous effects tells you to add a margin. Any design undergraduate should also be able to notice that life saver as well… however the GNOME team totally missed it.

      This isn’t the first time them failing at basic UX and they don’t like when people try to suggest improvements nor when they later on criticize them.

      • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Just because you like apple doens’t mean that apple does a perfect job and GNOME should copy it. GNOME does a lot of thing better than apple. And microsoft also does a couple of things better than apple. Apple isn’t perfect and microsoft isn’t all bad

        • TCB13@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Just because you like apple doens’t mean that apple does a perfect job and GNOME should copy it. GNOME does a lot of thing better than apple.

          Yes, so let’s copy Apple and keep the few things GNOME does well.

  • KrapKake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    As someone who tried out MacOS in a VM out of curiosity I don’t find gnome to be like MacOS at all in overall functionality. I think to most people it just looks like Mac because top bar, dock and some design choices. Really though gnome is much more like Android. MacOS felt extremely clunky to use vs gnome’s fluid workspace and app switching.

    • TCB13@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      it just looks like Mac because top bar, dock and some design choices

      Top bar, dock, system settings, activities (somewhat e mix between Apple’s mission control and launchpad), now the modal buttons, accent colors… and so many other things.

      MacOS felt extremely clunky to use vs gnome’s fluid workspace and app switching.

      Maybe you were running it without proper GPU acceleration and without a keyboard with actual macOS shortcuts on the function keys? Virtualizing macOS is hard and it will give you a very poor experience.

      Obviously macOS has it’s defects but at least you aren’t risking losing your work due to a misclick nor you are restricted from having desktop icons like you’re on GNOME :)

      • KrapKake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        No I did not have GPU accel. I’m curious what you are referring to losing work due to a misclick? Personally I don’t use desktop icons. I’m a previous i3 user so I am used to using my computer with a non traditional interface.

        • TCB13@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m curious what you are referring to losing work due to a misclick?

          If you place “Discard” and “Cancel” next to each other, without a margin in between, is easier a user looking to click on “Cancel” to click on “Discard” and lose a document. This is more common than people think and that’s why Apple added the margin there and also why any good UX manual tells you to add a margin for destructive operations like that one.

        • TCB13@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          See the problem there, regular users don’t Ctrl+s, they point and click.

    • TCB13@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The older one is actually properly executed, the first button is the “Cancel” one and that makes sense because people read from left to right and tend to click mindlessly / without reading on the first button. Not sure if they actually changed the position on right to left languages but they should have…

  • MXX53@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I started on gnome. I love it at first, but as time has gone on my experience with gnome had gotten worse and worse, and my KDE experience keeps getting better. It’s a real shame because I actually tend to prefer the gnome look at feel, but KDE has been so much more usable for me in recent years.

    • TCB13@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m kind of on the same boat you’re… however KDE tends to have issues with visual proportions and margins everywhere.

  • Krafting@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I actually like it, margin is maybe a bit much. For the apple extra margin, gnome app can add any buttons they want on those dialog, it is up to app devs to add an extra margin between some button!