zephyreks@lemmy.mlM to World News@lemmy.ml · 3 months agoU.S. Considers Expanded Nuclear Arsenal, a Reversal of Decades of Cutswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1112arrow-down13
arrow-up1109arrow-down1external-linkU.S. Considers Expanded Nuclear Arsenal, a Reversal of Decades of Cutswww.nytimes.comzephyreks@lemmy.mlM to World News@lemmy.ml · 3 months agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squarepingveno@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·3 months agoAgain, it’s not a matter of numbers. It’s a matter of maintaining a credible MAD threat so that any adversaries does not see nuclear war as a viable option. Nuclear weapons are meant to be brandished credibly as a response, not used.
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 months agoI’m pretty sure that numbers are how you present a credible MAD threat.
Again, it’s not a matter of numbers. It’s a matter of maintaining a credible MAD threat so that any adversaries does not see nuclear war as a viable option. Nuclear weapons are meant to be brandished credibly as a response, not used.
I’m pretty sure that numbers are how you present a credible MAD threat.