TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 5 months agoSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldTheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 5 months agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoWith such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
minus-squareEthan@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 months agoSo you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?
With such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
So you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?