TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 5 months agoSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldTheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 5 months agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareel_abuelo@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoHuh? I’ve worked with TypeScript + React for the last 5yrs and the only time I see OOP is when someone’s done something wrong. Maybe you’re thinking of old react with class based components?
minus-squaretoastal@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoProving that adding the class keyword to the ECMAScript spec was a mistake that leads folks down a path they should not travel 🙃
minus-squareel_abuelo@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoI completely agree. I taught JS/TS for 5yrs and I always emphasised that the ‘class’ keyword was just syntactic sugar for what was already available in prototype inheritance of JS.
Huh? I’ve worked with TypeScript + React for the last 5yrs and the only time I see OOP is when someone’s done something wrong.
Maybe you’re thinking of old react with class based components?
Proving that adding the
classkeyword to the ECMAScript spec was a mistake that leads folks down a path they should not travel 🙃I completely agree. I taught JS/TS for 5yrs and I always emphasised that the ‘class’ keyword was just syntactic sugar for what was already available in prototype inheritance of JS.