• joneskind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    173
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    TwitterBoy showing his blatant ignorance against one of the people who literally invented modern machine learning.

    Nothing shockingly unexpected from the very stable 10D chess master genius of course, but oh my, how embarrassing it must be for all the people working for him.

    • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ttereal tellers is ttattElonkows nothing about AI. Anyone involved in the field knows all of the big names because we read their papers, listen to their lectures, and talk about their models. He then goes on to be dismissive of work he’s not even close to understanding. It’s blatant ignorance, and Elon is used to just being able to power through his ignorance by either BSing his way past people who know no more than him or firing anyone who is actually qualified and as a result disagrees with him.

  • hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think that he should have avoided the interaction with musk, if he planned to convince Musk of something.

    If he planned to educate the general public, his approach is totally fine, though.

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      He did it for a two-fer. He educated the general public …and handed eloin his ass.

    • someacnt_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Imo it just makes things worse, esp. considering the platform is twitter. Interacting with musk won’t look good, given how manupulative musk is.

    • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      “*pffffbtbtbt* Facts are meaningless. You can use facts to prove anything that’s even remotely true.” - Homer Simpson

  • candybrie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Does 80 technical papers in 2.5 years seem kind of off to anyone else? That’s more than a paper every 2 weeks. Is there really time for meaningful research if you’re publishing that often? Is he advising a lot of students? If that’s the case, is he providing the attention generally needed for each one? Is his field just super different than mine?

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are some people in this world who are smarter and more motivated than we are.

      And then there are people who get a head start when their rich daddy gives 'em a bunch of money and they get lucky with how they invest that money but pretend to be a genius anyway.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              True, but you can compare writing 4000 novels a year with being able to write 80 papers a few pages long in 2.5 and say that both are possible.

              • refalo@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                He didn’t write all those papers. He put his name on them. He also finds it worth his time to publicly argue with a pig in shit, so there’s that.

              • candybrie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                The writing of the paper is generally a trivial part of the work. Each technical paper is supposed to be a succinct summary of months or years of technical work.

  • Miaou@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Anyone not knowing who LeCun has no idea about anything deep learning related.

  • bouldering_barista@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why are we still sharing snapshots from twitter?

    Let’s start capturing more interesting conversations that are happening on Lemmy and other places!

    • BuckFigotstheThird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      THANK YOU.

      I persistently work to get Twitter, elon, musk, cyber truck, Tesla, spacex, and every other x-affiliated bullshit out of my newsfeed, just for people to screenshot this shitty website. You like twitter, keep it on twitter. Cool.

      I suppose I’ll block the person who uploaded it.

      edit:spelling

      • isaaclw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nah. Brinfing them here is more diversity, and lets people choose.

        People will use twitter and tumbler and instagram, even if they switch from reddit to lemmy.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    What does you’re going soft, try harder even mean in this case? I think that’s a troll, right? Right? I mean, even one solid theory from a paper can change the course of an industry. How do people think things work? I feel dizzy reading this whole exchange