ylai@lemmy.ml to Gaming@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agoUbisoft insists yet again that its uncanny AI-generated 'NEO-NPCs' will make games 'more alive and richer', whatever that meanswww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up156arrow-down12
arrow-up154arrow-down1external-linkUbisoft insists yet again that its uncanny AI-generated 'NEO-NPCs' will make games 'more alive and richer', whatever that meanswww.pcgamer.comylai@lemmy.ml to Gaming@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squareHackworth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·4 months agoSo if they don’t hallucinate, have object permanence, and are fun to talk to, you’re all good with gen AI NPCs?
minus-squareIzzyScissor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 months agoThose are not my ONLY issues, no. They’re the most egregious for a videogame right now, but the entire concept is just … Fluff for no reason other than to list “AI NPCs” on the box. Paying for more writers is simply better all around.
minus-squareHackworth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·4 months agoAnd do you believe paying for more writers will remain a better option for the foreseeable future?
So if they don’t hallucinate, have object permanence, and are fun to talk to, you’re all good with gen AI NPCs?
Those are not my ONLY issues, no. They’re the most egregious for a videogame right now, but the entire concept is just … Fluff for no reason other than to list “AI NPCs” on the box.
Paying for more writers is simply better all around.
And do you believe paying for more writers will remain a better option for the foreseeable future?