lemmyreader@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agoStack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPTwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1349arrow-down14
arrow-up1345arrow-down1external-linkStack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPTwww.tomshardware.comlemmyreader@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squarebaseless_discourse@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·edit-24 months agoThis is a violation of GDPR, no? EDIT: user created content is not directly protected under GDPR, only personally identifiable data is pertected under GDPR.
minus-squarelemmyreader@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 months agoDunno. GDPR is a Europe only thing, and isn’t it only related to how your private data (like name, IP address, phone number) is cared about ?
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoHow does GDPR get away with not defining what a website is when referring to them directly in the law? Like what counts, only html? http? ftp? gopher?
This is a violation of GDPR, no?
EDIT: user created content is not directly protected under GDPR, only personally identifiable data is pertected under GDPR.
Dunno. GDPR is a Europe only thing, and isn’t it only related to how your private data (like name, IP address, phone number) is cared about ?
How does GDPR get away with not defining what a website is when referring to them directly in the law? Like what counts, only html? http? ftp? gopher?