• frog 🐸
    link
    fedilink
    English
    04 months ago

    Nope, I think they would still be right. No matter what, a baby’s shit-covered arse doesn’t belong on a table in a restaurant. That’s just gross.

    • Deceptichum
      link
      fedilink
      04 months ago

      Exactly right, it doesn’t.

      Which is why the owners are responsible for providing the safe clean place for them.

      • frog 🐸
        link
        fedilink
        English
        04 months ago

        Making the other customers suffer, and potentially get ill, isn’t a reasonable response to a business doing something shitty. Just don’t go to restaurants that don’t provide baby-changing facilities. Don’t expose innocent people to your baby’s shit.

          • frog 🐸
            link
            fedilink
            English
            04 months ago

            Nope, inflicting excrement on innocent people is never an appropriate response.

            • @MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              04 months ago

              Collateral damage in a just war. Don’t patronize restaurants that charge for the restroom and you’re in the clear there, while also being on the morally correct side of history.

              • frog 🐸
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                I don’t patronise restaurants that charge for toilet use. But that doesn’t put me on the side of parents who put their baby’s shitty arse on tables where people eat. Both sides of this “war” are shitty people that I want nothing to do with.

        • Deceptichum
          link
          fedilink
          04 months ago

          Practically for their customers.

          Ideologically and wistfully for everyone.

          • HeartyBeast
            link
            fedilink
            04 months ago

            My local authority in East London pays local cafes a small amount if they make their toilets available to the general public and display a sign on the door. This feels like a good pragmatic solution to me.

            • frog 🐸
              link
              fedilink
              English
              04 months ago

              Yeah, that is definitely a nice, pragmatic solution. I imagine it’s cheaper for the local council than running public toilets themselves, too.