• ooterness@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Why would they name it “Visio”? That is already the name of a different Microsoft product.

    • ivn@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because that’s the French word for it, a visioconférence.

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    France has horrible laws for encryption, so how much do you want to bet this thing doesn’t have e2ee.

    This is an Intel operation

  • idriss@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    That’s one good place I want to see tax payer money going. Would be nice if a more governments join in and make big corpo irrelevant.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    I get that government use needs to be stringently tested for security, and so things take a little longer. But really, there are PLENTY of good FOSS products in existence that can be used as a base framework and a head-start to things like this.

    You don’t have to re-invent the wheel when you could easily fork Jitsi-meet and harden it/secure it to your needs in the government.

    Jitsi is one of my top 5 FOSS projects that are basically already mature enough to be used in a professional setting

  • idriss@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    That’s one good place I want to see tax payer money going. Would be nice if a more governments join in and make big corpo irrelevant.

  • racoon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Nota bene how the description omits the world “encryption”. Timeo Frenchmen et dona ferentes