You must log in or register to comment.
Everyone who’s dealt with kids knows you have to bisect the giraffe equally from nose to tail so everyone gets 2 legs, or somebody will cry that it’s unfair.
I let one cut and the other gets to pick first.
This is the way. And from experience, it will result in sub-nanometer size differences.
Make sure to get the same number of spots too.
deleted by creator
This is why real scientists use the only reasonable real world measurement - a perfectly spherical cow in a vacuum.
Dear gods
How far will these Americans go to not use the metric system… ffs
obviously the scientists meant a spherical giraffe in a vacuum
Personally I thought it was obvious that they were talking about the outer half
So like the size of a horse?
The average horse is about half the height and weight of the average giraffe. Giraffes are just a really bad unit of measurement, males weight about 400kg more than females and there is a wide height difference over their global population, they are technically four different species we just all call giraffe 🦒
I was just going to say, what kind of weird ass size comparison is that. It’s almost as egregious as saying “half the size of two apples”.
The Daily Mail readership will not fathom your question. It is a rag for those who would follow MAGA but want to appear intelligent without have either the natural talent or putting in any work to increase knowledge. Baseline racism is a requirement
The anatomical answer is sagitally down the midline.
They could have just used inanimate objects not requiring bisection; basketballs, refrigerators, cars, busses, buildings, etc. Why bring sn abattoir into the mix?
Bilaterally as is the way.
Halved with a vertical cut.
The thing that’s bothering me is that they ended a question with a period. Why, random person on the Internet, why?
Bifurcated down between the eyes
deleted by creator
Laterally.
