• zephyreks@lemmy.mlOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    EDF, the French developer responsible for the project, is demanding more money from the UK in order to fulfill the contract.

    • JackOfNoTrades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The UK doesn’t have great solar energy potential because of the high latitude and general lack of sun. Wind is much more practical in this country however like solar it provides it’s a non-stable energy source. To have a stable energy grid you ideally want a mix of stable and non-stable sources or non-stable sources and large battery storage facilities.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Weird how anything that can possibly reduce fossil fuel usage is always too expensive, yet building pipelines, and north sea oil platforms, and shipping oil all over the world is free or the cost is not worth talking about.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Weird how anything that can possibly reduce fossil fuel usage is always too expensive

      That’s not true. Wind and solar are often cheaper than fossil fuels and the prices are still going down.

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sure but they can’t replace fossil fuels. Every single renewable energy scheme that a government invests int has Natural Gas plants that are running 24/7 to handle peak demand and smooth out the supply curve of solar/wind.

          • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            They can’t be kept on cold standby, so they aren’t running at 100% capacity 24/7, but they do have to run.