• SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    8 months ago

    I still have my WRT54G around somewhere. Loved that thing. What I found interesting was that when the firmware went open demand for that model went through the roof. Wish more companies would realize that there is a demand for that market.

    • Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      I had mine running for probably 10+ years but eventually started acting screwy a few years back. I went ahead and upgraded to a TP-Link and I’ve bee satisfied with it. I haven’t looked into if you can still get these custom firmwares for modern routers - but I’ve also been satisfied with the interface and the performance.

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      But how are you gonna push your internet security monthly subscription with open firmware silly

  • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Interesting, though I question why a battery backed RTC is seen as so critically important. Of all the features I can think of wanting in a router, a battery backed RTC doesn’t even begin to make the cut. A device that is powered up 24/7 and connected to the Internet can just get NTP time whenever it boots up and keep time using the OS. What is so necessary about an RTC here? I get that time is used for certificate verification and other security stuff, but again NTP and always powered. Are they concerned that NTP could be an attack vector?

    I’m interested in a new OpenWRT router as my WRT1900ACS is getting older and the WiFi driver on it never had amazing support. Right now the Banana Pi R4 looks promising as a WiFi 7 OpenWRT supported router as it looks like most off the shelf WiFi 7 routers do not have OpenWRT support.

    • Sal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      A battery back RTC could make it faster and more reliable reconnect after power loss?

    • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Network time was an attack vector against windows recently. It’s real easy to just not guess what time it is based on devices around you though and knowing what time it is helps you figure out what’s going on.

      The real ask isn’t an rtc chip, it’s the battery socket and battery. Theres rtcs baked into all kinds of chips now, they just need something to keep em ticking.

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    OpenWrt is a great piece of software. …As is the hackers that get it running on the proprietary hardware.

  • λλλ@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    This looks pretty cool. I haven’t used OpenWRT in years. Does it support mesh or adding another access point somehow?

    Either way, I’m happy with my current OPNSense/unifi setup.

  • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Awesome, now upstream everything so I can install Debian on the hardware instead of OpenWRT.