Timothée Besset, a software engineer who works on the Steam client for Valve, took to Mastodon this week to reveal: “Valve is seeing an increasing number of bug reports for issues caused by Canonical’s repackaging of the Steam client through snap”.

“We are not involved with the snap repackaging. It has a lot of issues”, Besset adds, noting that “the best way to install Steam on Debian and derivative operating systems is to […] use the official .deb”.

Those who don’t want to use the official Deb package are instead asked to ‘consider the Flatpak version’ — though like Canonical’s Steam snap the Steam Flatpak is also unofficial, and no directly supported by Valve.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I know the “Arch BTW” meme exists for a reason, but one of the reasons I haven’t been able to drag myself away from Arch-based distros in recent years is that it allows me to always have current versions of my software while also just not having to care about all this appimage/flatpak/snap brouhaha.

    I guess it’s somewhat of a “pick your poison” kind of situation, but I find dealing with the typical complaints about Arch based distros to be both less of a problem than detractors would have you believe, and less of a headache than having to pick one of three competing alternative packaging approaches, or worse, to use a mix of them all. Standing on the sidelines of the topic it seems like a small number of people really like that these options exist, and I’m happy for those people. But mostly I’m grateful that I don’t have to care about this kind of thing.

    • Grain9325@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yup, the AUR is a godsend. I barely touch the other methods and only use AppImages when I’m too lazy.

  • maness300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    That’s the problem with doing everything yourself.

    You also have to maintain everything, yourself.

    Fuck snaps 🖕

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m really hoping this all forces Ubuntu out as the face of desktop Linux.

    It’s been pretty low tier for years now, and Canonical just proves corporate backing doesn’t guarantee a good distro.

    Snap is pretty garbage, default GNOME is horrendous, the repos break every other month, apt is still pretty lame despite being an user upgrade for apt-get, the packages are neither stable nor cutting edge, they change core OS backends like every update which breaks configs and makes documentation obsolete.

    I’d like to suggest Fedora as the new goto, but I feel like it’s a bit too privacy and FOSS oriented which may scare away new users.

    Debian is great but it doesn’t have latest packages which isn’t optimal as performance upgrades would take time to release or need to be manually installed.

    • LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      unfortunately, industry loves shit like Ubuntu and RHEL because of their corporate backing. comps love having the insurance of someone to blame or somebody to fix their shit when things hit the fan. I’ve worked for many comps who choose RHEL for that alone. Should we choose the OS built by a bunch of randos in their basement, or something backed by Red Hat where I can just pay them money to handle my support tickets faster if shit blows up? or who tf do I have my cyber liabilities insurance guys sue if the OS has a huge fuckin problem? I want a company behind that shit.

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Who the fuck was asking for a Steam Snap.

    JFC

    Give up on snaps. It’s not gonna happen. Whatever benefits they claim they could provide could be merged into Flatpak and everyone wins.

    • xe3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Flatpak is not designed to solve all the same problems as snap they have very different scopes and goals. It’s really only Linux hobbyists that see these as comparable technologies.

      Also the Steam flatpak is unofficial just like the snap, they would be unwilling to support flatpak issues as well.