https://zeta.one/viral-math/

I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.

It’s about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it’s worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I’m probably biased because I wrote it :)

  • Kogasa
    link
    fedilink
    07 months ago

    My opinion hasn’t changed. The standard order of operations is as well defined as a notational convention can be. It’s not necessarily followed strictly in practice, but it’s easier to view such examples as normal deviation from the rules instead of an implicit disagreement about the rules themselves. For example, I know how to “properly” capitalize my sentences too, and I intentionally do it “wrong” all the time. To an outsider claiming my capitalization is incorrect, I don’t say “I am using a different standard,” I just say “Yes, I know, I don’t care.” This is simpler because it accepts the common knowledge of the “normal” rules and communicates a specific intent to deviate. The alternative is to try to invent a new set of ad hoc rules that justify my side, and explain why these rules are equally valid to the ones we both know and understand.

      • Kogasa
        link
        fedilink
        07 months ago

        I have a masters in math, please do not condescend. I’m fully aware of both interpretations and your overall point and I’ve explained my response.

        • @wischi@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          -17 months ago

          I still don’t see a number ;-) but you can take a look at the meme to see other people with math degrees shouting at each other.

          • Kogasa
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            Sorry your article wasn’t as interesting as you hoped.